when it comes to comparison Hyper v vs VMware, With constant innovation and drive to bring efficiency in customer support and work management, businesses IT’s has been implementing virtualization throughout every functional head. Virtualization comes as a commitment to build a more efficient and performance-driven model for business firms to ensure maximum potential output.
Most business that has moved from the legacy system or has at least partially virtualized their legacy processes has seen a surge in business performance and delivery. However, if you’re considering a first-time migration, you need to understand the key role of a certain component in the overall virtualization of your system.
What is a Hypervisor?
One of the key components of the virtualization process is the hypervisor. A hypervisor is basically the culmination of hardware, software, and an operating system. See when we talk about virtualizing legacy processes, we need virtual machines to run these processes. That is where the hypervisor comes into play. A hypervisor is designed to support and run most of the established operating systems in the market. A properly implemented and optimized hypervisor will help ensure ease of use, resource allocation with minimal disruption, and overall efficiency.
Though there are a number of hypervisors, the two most commonly used ones are vSphere, a VMware product, and Hyper-V, by Microsoft. Let us look at the pros and cons of these individually.
Hyper-V is the flagship hypervisor designed by Microsoft for their enterprise-class virtualization. Being a Microsoft product, the hyper-V is generally run on a windows server or it can also be run as a standalone server.
The distinct feature of hyper-V is that it has a set of integrated management tools. These tools can be used by administrators who are somewhat familiar with the Microsoft setup. The tools come in handy regardless of the state of migration or process implementation in either cloud or physical drives.
- Easy migration
- Intuitive configuration
- Easy backup
- Windows Active Directory enabled for protection
- Comparative cheaper
- No downtime for maintenance.
- Almost no support for RemoteFX
- The number of guest OS choice is limited
VMware has been the hypervisor of choice for many. The reason is attributed to its intuitive design, customization feature, and all-around support. The flagship hypervisor from VMware, the vSphere is now on its 6th version.
Unlike the Microsoft Hyper-V, VMware offers a multitude of the customized hypervisor to cater to your specific needs. Whether you’re choosing the standard or the enterprise plus or some other that are currently offered, you will get the same level of reliability and support VMware is known for.
- Wider OS support.
- Better suited for major corporations
- Better online support
- Virtually zero downtime
- Intuitive and interactive design
- You get governance control.
- Comparatively higher priced.
- The learning curve is steep.
Hyper v vs VMware – Which One Should You Get?
Now that we have familiarized ourselves with what they do, their pros and cons, we shall now put them head-to-head on certain key determinants to find out which one is for you and your organization.
Level of Scalability
When it comes to scalability and maximum potential reach of each hypervisor, the Hyper-V outperforms the VMware.
The logical processor and physical memory for each of the hosts are the same. But when it comes to active VM’s per host, maximum nodes, and maximum VM’s, the Hyper-V outnumbers the VMware every time.
Design pros and cons
The design pros and cons for Hyper-V and VMware are shown in the table below –
|Microsoft Hyper-V||Protected against attacks due to lack of API.|
Less initializing time.
The Control panel is more flexible. Installations can be done in the controlling layer.
|OS crash in the controlling layer means a system-wide shutdown.|
A higher number of overheads required in the controlling layer.
|VMware||No hassle of security patches. |
You do not need an OS to run the VMware.
|Only supports limited hardware.|
In conclusion, Hyper-V has more advantages as an enterprise solution compared to VMware.
Support of OS
We have already mentioned that VMware supports a higher number of OS and guest OS compared to that of Hyper-V. The list of supported OS includes – Asianux 4, Solaris, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Oracle Linux 7, FreeBSD, Mac OS X
When it comes to Hyper-V, windows are all over it. However, the hypervisor does support a number of OS including – CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Debian, Oracle Linux, SUSE, Ubuntu, FreeBSD
When it comes to performance, independent research was conducted in a controlled environment with designated testing mechanisms. In all of the tests, the Hyper-V outperformed the VMware.
This is also another driving factor when it comes to choosing the required Hypervisor. There are both a free trial version and a licensing option for Hyper-V and VMware. Though some functional mechanisms are missing from the VMware Hyper-V offers a full experience.
When it comes to licensing, the range for Hyper-V starts from zero and goes all the way up to $3,607. But depending on your organization’s computational needs, you may have to pay more.
The pricing for VMware starts at $995 and moves up to $4245. Herein also, you have to pay extra for additional computation and support.
We will not get into the licensing inclusions and technicalities of storage and networking as they are both similar to each other in that regard.
So, there you have it, our comprehensive take on the two most popular hypervisor in the market, the Hyper-V and VMware.
Each of these hypervisors has its own set of advantages and features that sets them apart. You may be considering one for a large scale organization where VMware will give you the edge. On the other hand, organizations that want uniformity across platforms should definitely consider the Hyper-V.
No matter which one you choose, be sure to check and compare with the aforementioned points of Hyper v vs VMware to determine whether it is the right choice for you.